I am basically a professional worrier by training and genetic gene pool encoding.
Maybe that comes with the territory of being a former journalist working in conflict zones, or investing people’s money in the bipolar public markets? Who’s to know. What I do believe… there is change afoot.
A question:
Do you know what the biggest success of the nation-state has been to date?
Uplifting people out of poverty? Yes, assuredly.
Innovation and technological advancement? Certainly a portion of it.
But the truth…. eventually, you live long enough to see the hero become the villain.
One of the biggest successes of the nation-state is its ability to confiscate wealth from its citizens.
This is a bold, controversial statement.
Let’s pause before anyone gets all hot and bothered. To be clear, it is not a political statement, all politicians lose power if the nation-state is on its sunset hour. Both red and blue. It’s just a theory I’ve been ruminating about.
Do you want to hear what keeps me up at night?
I believe we may be in the midst of one of the most tumultuous periods of our day and age in the US (and perhaps globally). That during our lifetimes we will see the internet age run headfirst into the nation-state. They will battle, one will reign supreme, and the world will look much different following. The truth for us contrarians is:
Those who are successful in life are the people who notice what's wrong or missing and find opportunity in it.
My hope here is that this starts to get your wheels turning and you begin to ponder the “truths” about our society today and how to invest, protect and thrive in a world amidst massive change.
No one knows the answer for sure, but the thing about rising tides is, if you ignore them, you’ll drown just standing still.
My thesis: The ENTIRE reason we have government is one thing - protection. They maintain law and order. Life in a society without laws would be unsafe and unpredictable. So we trade some of our freedoms, and money, for in essence some degree of safety. By almost any measure nation-states have wildly expensive for their citizens to partake in.
There’s a false narrative that says that in the 1950’s we taxed at 90% (fake news). In fact taxes on the top 1% were an effective rate of 16.9% instead of 36-40% today.
Their incentives are misaligned (they don’t have to make the $) so they spend at high levels and instead of businesses who look to do things efficiently - they are incentivized to have bigger budgets, not smaller. That is why they continue to take more taxes, increase spending and blow out their budgets.
Maybe you say philosophically you don’t agree. That’s fine. But here’s the rub - when government overreach and *especially* monetary overreach happens… humans throughout history don’t stand idly by. So even if you think I’m a black heart who cares naught for humanity… our feelings on the matter may not matter.
Washington Has Become the Vatican & Rome
Here’s an argument compiled from research in The Sovereign Individual, Fourth Turning, and Revolt of the Public (all worthy reads).
Before we take a step further, WE ARE THINKERS HERE. If you disagree in the comments tell me—why? If you have ideas, share them. Don’t get angry, get educated. I will too. We don’t talk about the world as we WISH it was, we look the ugly brute in the face and say I see all sides of you, now how will we best tame you?
Let’s take a walk through history to the days when the Church reigned supreme.
The Catholic Church from the 12-15th century was in fact very similar to the nation-states today in some respects. They reigned both in law and in the regulation of money. Take yee care those who did not abide.
Instead of the IRS tax code, and federal regulations they had canon law.
Instead of giving a percentage of your wealth (income taxes) to the state you tithed a percentage of your wealth to the church or had papal income taxes.
Instead of going to jail for non-payment, you were sequestered (aka they took your property) often by force or you were ex-communicated.
Why did the Church fall from power?
Some say:
The Roman Catholic Church began to lose its power as church officials bickered. At one point there were even two popes at the same time, each one claiming to be the true Pope.1 Eek, sound familiar?
The Black Death (the plague) and the Church’s inability to deal with it led to its decline. Hmmm, cough cough COVID?
The clergy was seen as corrupt, ignorant and lazy. They sold “indulgences,” which was how you bought your way out of sins. Political pardons or insider trading allowances anyone?
The people resented the increased monopoly of the Church (it was both the largest landowner, tax collector, and fishery owner) and wanted the freedom to speak, earn and increasingly learn, as writings became more widely available. Like ya know, the internet and decentralized currency.
Protestantism was created and allowed for the idea to change that wealth was to be given entirely to the church now, it could be kept.
What happened to the Church’s constituents and followers?
“When failing systems have the power to do so they often seek to squeeze their constituents with pressure. This is worth remembering.” - Sovereign Individual
The twilight of systems in the past have never ended nice and orderly. Knights from the Church tracked down citizens for their taxes, confiscating property, and humans. The Church did all it could to cling to power. In addition, as the Roman Empire fell there are records stating the Romans mercilessly tracked down citizens to confiscate their wealth and deny them the ability to leave. The same was true in Egypt as ancient records show more prosperous properties were abandoned along the Nile than kept as the Roman nation-state devolved. The “propertied” class was held at their mercy. There is an echo here.
The point of this is not to hate on taxes. There is a price we all are willing to pay for protection, intellectual property, ease of doing business, infrastructure and rule of law. The thing is - when people start charging you when you want to leave a concert, not when you come in, that’s typically called a shakedown, not a tax.
You are seeing this play out right now in front of our eyes.
Just ponder:
#1 On the Good Side: States & Cities Are Competing For YOU - the Citizen
When was the last time you had mayors and governors actually fighting publicly for citizens, not companies? Think hard. This has never happened before in our lifetimes. (Mayor Suarez’s billboard in San Francisco trying to get tech talent to Miami).
Or Greg Abbott - tweeting out about Texas being open for business as a human.
Abbott Campaigning for Texas as the Best Place to Live. Minus ya know when it snows apparently. Chuckled that Texas could get shut down by a few snowflakes, although it was less funny when I was in it without power or water. (I’m at least equal opportunity trolling on both sides).
#2 Bad Side: The States with The Exodus Will Not Go Quietly Into the Night
Hotel California: You Can Check Out Any Time But You Can’t Ever Leave? California levying a proposed wealth tax, and a recouping tax that comes after you when you leave and based on any days spent there. Might want to rethink starting your company in the Sunshine state I so love.
Elizabeth Warren proposing a 3% wealth tax on Billionaires & Multi-millionaires. Listen, I get how easy it is to hate on billionaires. But these people are liars. First of all it’s also people with a $50M net worth AND more importantly, what politicians don’t want you to realize is that they just start at the top and work their way down. We’d do well to remember: Every freedom you take away from another, expect it to be taken from you as well. I call it trickle down regulations.
“We yearn for civic character but satisfy ourselves with symbolic gestures and celebrity circuses. We perceive no greatness in our leaders, a new meanness in ourselves. Small wonder that each new election brings a new jolt, its aftermath a new disappointment.”
Excerpt From: The Fourth Turning, William Strauss & Neil Howe
#3 America’s Exit Tax
I was sitting in a London pub (oh yes, there was a world in which we did such things), chatting with a very successful founder friend who lived in Southeast Asia. He had been there for a decade-plus, his kids speak 5 languages, business is booming, he’s married to a local. So he thought about renouncing his US citizenship. As anyone living abroad still has to pay federal taxes, EVEN IF they earned entirely in another country. So he was shelling out a lot of money for an inability to use any US resources. That’s when I first learned of the US exit tax.
To grossly overly simplify, if you have over $2M in assets or $100k+ in earnings get ready to pay a 23.8% tax on “gains” as if you sold all your assets.
Why is this happening?
There is a widening gap between the haves and the have nots, the in the knows and the on the outs. Here’s the problem, it’s not from ANYTHING you hear about in the media. Do you want to know the REAL reason why there is a rift larger than the Grand Canyon that is growing? It comes down to who has self-ability and who doesn’t.
Who can:
decide to no longer work for corporations
take their children out of school and do it themselves
have multiple passports
can move from cities, states and countries
diversify their revenue streams
invest in decentralized assets (hard to seize someone’s millions from a thumb drive)
Here’s my concern. When people try to make it harder to leave it’s usually not a good sign. It means they think the value they will give you is less than the value you will give them. Otherwise, they’d have to build a wall to keep people out not in.
The government cannot survive without you working to pay for it.
We’d do well to remember that government SERVES THEIR PEOPLE. We do not serve them. Government is funded BY THE PEOPLE. They do not generate wealth themselves. They are a wildly beneficial parasite. Parasites can be symbiotic, even crucial to life. But sometimes, parasites can kill the host.
That is one reason I created Contrarian Thinking, we need to think critically right now. Or drown standing still.
What to Do In the Case I’m Not 1000% Wrong
There are always ways to earn, protect and learn in these periods of great transition.
So here’s what we’re doing about it:
1) Read: The Sovereign Individual, Fourth Turning, and Revolt of the Public (all worthy reads).
2) Watch some alternative voices such as Nomad Capitalist. If you like him we’ll do an interview with him.
2) Listen to our upcoming Contrarian Cashflow Call w/ Mitchell Baldridge on Taxation and how to do it intelligently (have to be a member).
3) Listen to our upcoming Contrarian Cashflow Call w/ Mike Dillard on Crypto and how to invest in decentralized assets (have to be a member).
Hope I’m wrong, if I am, the worst you’ll have is options, diversified income, assets, financial freedom, and peace of mind. I’m so sorry about all that. But if I’m right… oof.
Question everything and luck favors the prepared,
Codie
Get In The Contrarian Cashflow Know
Today is the last day we extended entrance to the Contrarian Cashflow Founders Club. Times almost out. Join us.
https://www.penfield.edu/webpages/jgiotto/onlinetextbook.cfm?subpage=1512314
DISCLAIMER: This is the be an adult section, not advice, just what I did. Said otherwise: This article is presented for informational purposes only, is an opinion, and is not intended to recommend any investment, and is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase an interest in any current or future investment vehicle managed or sponsored by Entourage Effect Capital, LLC, Codie Ventures, LLC or its affiliates. All material presented in this newsletter is not to be regarded as investment advice, but for general informational purposes only. Day trading and investing does involve risk, so caution must always be utilized. We cannot guarantee profits or freedom from loss. You assume the entire cost and risk. You are solely responsible for making your own investment decisions. We recommend consulting with a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, and/or financial advisor. If you choose to invest with or without seeking advice from such an advisor or entity, then any consequences resulting from your investments are your sole responsibility. Reading and using this newsletter or using our content on the web/server, you are indicating your consent and agreement to our disclaimer.
11 | 10 |
Really enjoyed this Codie
I agree, nation-states have taken for granted their pre-industrial raison-d’etre of monopolizing force and operating as a protectorate to their constituents. In other words: to protect them from anarchy. As monopoly on force has been largely accomplished (and long ago), definitions on the new role of nation-states have definitely changed. What we have now could be described as a large departure from just protecting citizens.
The nation-state has enormous power to draw wealth from its citizens. I would argue, however, that their biggest success has been helping create the safest, most prosperous and fruitful society that we have ever seen. Even if you believe that things may be faltering lately, the American standard of society has essentially provided the backdrop for this new level of globalization, productivity, and a business climate. Not to mention, we live in a historic and rather unprecedented time of relative peace. Society doesn’t get there without taxation. Business climates are a result of a multitude of factors, many of them are safeguarded by the nation-state.
There is a growing body of research in political science that points to acceptable rates of taxation, linking public opinion on the necessity and rate of taxes, to overall national pride. For example, it is often noted in many Scandinavian countries that civic pride and taxation go hand in hand. People are sure that their taxed money is going to the right place and there is a level of transparency that lends itself well to civic trust. There are definitely drawbacks to this approach, as the tax rate in these countries can be enormous.
As a caveat, I find it hard to believe that raising the current threshold of taxation would have the intended affect desired. For me, its not so simple as taking from the rich and giving to the poor. It can have the opposite effect, where unfavourable tax incentives drive the uber-elite business class to a more favourable location. Secondly, I don’t believe the average American voter sees the value in this, and I wouldn’t either.
Although I do not live in the States, a large portion of my background in studying politics covered the US. From my perspective, that level of trust just is not there, and national pride does not entangle itself with ideas of taxation, it may even be the opposite.
The answer, as it often does, means a meet in the middle somewhere.
Is this evidence of a decline, or even an end to Nation-states?
I don’t believe so.
Almost since inception, the United States as a nation-state has had its doubters. As had the initial nation-states arising originally out of defenestration.
For sure we will see power change or even diffuse. As you noted, the internet age has the power to elucidate these movements. At the same time, we are seeing nation-states catch up on this front using social-media in similar ways.
Is Washington like the Vatican and Rome?
I think you hit the nail on the head here. There are a lot of similarities shared between the two. Crowded power base, increased financial ask from citizens, a massive spending problem, and an unstoppable industrial complex would all lend credence to this issue.
At the same time, pundits have been taking shots at the Washington forever. In almost every decade, we see a sort of hysteria behind the faltering influence of Washington, all while America has remained the example to the rest of the world. We are definitely seeing more shots fired Washington’s way, and 2020 definitely wasn’t the best look.
You are spot on in seeing the tide rising. Nation-states need to be more accountable to justify even the current level of taxation.
Hope I am not off the mark here Codie, I really enjoyed reading this and it has been a pleasure to engage with you!
Let's say you're right which you probably are, the proper course is to create an alternative that we all can choose when we say no to the current system. Otherwise it won't happen in a way that is pretty or won't happen at all...lots of example in history of messy revolutions and power grabs. However, once an attractive alternative is available, we simply choose the alternative and the other no longer exists.